- I feel the first paragraph is clear on introducing both the story and psychological theme I choose. Although I do feel I need to elaborate and provide more detail. The first sentence is definitely relevant in giving a quick synopsis of the story.
- The thesis statement is obvious in that it refers to Alice from “Alice in Wonderland” along with theme I will write about. Thesis: Throughout the story Alice can be seen to have a poor self-image. Despite the fact that the thesis can be identified it definitely needs to be further supported. If I provide that support, any reader would be able to see why I made that observation and came to that conclusion.
- I feel like each opening statement helps to provide a brief introduction of what’s to come in the paragraph that follows. The main concepts I choose to write about was self-image as well as its relation to both personality and self-perception. Each paragraph somewhat helps to further those main concepts but I definitely need to add more details.
- I need some work or better reviewing my paper to find run on sentences and lack of punctuation in necessary areas. However I do find the usage of certain words and style of sentences to be helpful in proving my point.
- I need a lot of work on citing my references.
- The papers strengths are that it serves a strong argument about the theme I have chosen and how that theme is seen throughout “Alice in Wonderland”. Also it provides an interesting perspective on how self-image can be tied to other themes.
Monday, March 28, 2011
Self Review
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1. I completely agree with Shima, her and I both stated the same thing about how relevant the first sentence is to the topic and that I need to add more details.
ReplyDelete2. Shima and I both felt my thesis needed to be further supported. Although the thesis itself can be indentified.
3. We both felt the main concepts were clear in introducing what's to come in the following paragraph. However we agree that more detail needs to be presented.
4. We both agree on the mistakes I have made.
5. Shima and I both feel I need some work on citing my references.
6. Shima felt my papers strength was that it grabbed the readers attention. We agreed that it was thorough and served a strong argument.